Sunday, September 1, 2013

Sam Smathers 4th


Morals? Since when are those something we have?

Sam Smathers 4th period 

“Revenge porn’ should be a crime” by Danielle Keats Citron from CNN news describes the harm of posting an ex significant other’s naked photo on the Internet. Danielle uses an example to aid us in understanding her point. In this scenario a woman, “Jane” sends naked photos to her boyfriend, who after the breakup posts them to a website for naked photos of exes. “Jane” then receives calls and emails from men who saw her naked via this website in a harassing manner.
The author then goes on to explain the emotional effects that "revenge porn" has on a person such as withdrawing “from online engagement, shutting down their social media profiles and blogs to prevent strangers from finding them online. They cannot participate fully in our networked age.” Danielle also points out the fact that may employers look at the Internet as a kind of resume for hiring someone, and when they find naked photos of the applicant online they are much less likely to hire them.
In closing Danielle calls for all states to follow in New Jersey’s precedent and make disclosing nude photos without the naked person’s consent illegal. She goes on to say that this is an invasion of privacy and that “young people, think that shaming and terrorizing individuals is an acceptable practice”. Her grand finale reads something along the lines of treating the symptoms to cancer, but ignoring the mutated cells as a problem.
         I thought the article was ridiculous for many reasons, one being the lack of respect or acknowledgment for how the girl is asking for what she got. She sent the photos, and the thought that this young hormonal guy wouldn’t want to show them off. As sweet and naive as this may seem, she is not the victim, there is no victim. All I see is stupidity.  
With even a basic knowledge of human dynamics, one can correctly deduce that men have an innate desire to show possession and intimidate other guys by showing them the pretty girls they have dated. With this basic logic, sending naked photos would never be a good idea. Danielle asks for posting the photos to be illegal, instead of claiming for the photos themselves to be illegal. I honestly think if you are ignorant enough to send photos to a guy, or ignorant enough to send photos to a girl, than you deserve whatever you get.
Danielle acts like not being able to participate in the cyber space is a bad thing, like catching syphilis or something. Not being able to check tumblr would free up people a lot more time to actually talk to people and do human things. Technology is taking over our relationships and this is clearly shown through how Danielle thinks that the act of posting naked photos is an issue. She ignores the real problem, the Internet. Real relationships cannot be created via illuminated screens, face to face time is essential, if you have to send photos, you are not getting enough face-to-face time.
Danielle also groups all young people together in this stereotype of rambunctious hooligans that run around having sex and no morals. The fact that she thought that she could group all young people together in the first place, is just ridiculous. Teenagers are the most diverse beautiful group of people. We are as creative as the human race ever gets. Our lack of judgment allows us to live without thinking. We believe that we cannot die, because as long as we are remembered in the slight breeze of a hot summer day, we are truly invincible. Danielle tries to subjugate the only pure part of the human race by throwing the trash of bad judgment on us, and I cringe in disgust.
This article served the purpose of reminding me that the American government and press are composed of more than one opinion, and that is what makes this country a perfect stadium for change. Even if I find said opinions to be preposterous and downright wrong, living in the U.S.A has taught me to be intelligently critical, instead of blindly accepting.

This is the article I wrote my current event based off of:
 http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/29/opinion/citron-revenge-porn/index.html?hpt=us_mid

2 comments:

  1. Byron 5th Period- Hey Sam, I have a couple disagreements with you on this topic. What you said leads me to believe you think a man isn't responsible for his own actions, that any man with a brain would show naked pictures of his ex to everyone on the internet, because that is just what men, with their hormones and such, would do. That is pretty insulting, and is comparable to saying a woman can't be in a position of power, because, you know, they just can't handle it, because of hormones and such. If it's such an obvious outcome for the pictures to be posted on the internet, and that anyone who would have such photos taken of them "deserve what they get", then the whole concept of telling a secret to a loved one is absolutely insane, because of course, once there's a problem in the relationship, the crazy hormonal guy will go insane and post all your intimate secrets on the internet, to shame you and make you a recluse! This isn't an extremely common occurrence. Most people have the dignity, common sense, and kindness NOT TO BE CRUEL JERKS. Also, you say the only bad (or, in your opinion, good) result of such actions would be to keep "Jane" off tumblr, and to make her spend more time with her friends, instead of just staring at a computer screen. The pictures, obviously, could pose more problems than that. If her picture(s) become easily found on the internet, any possible employer would find them during a background check, and they would have serious doubts about hiring her. This kind of sexual shaming can damage someone's life in ways you did not cover in your essay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was using irony to show in my response how I made the same mistakes as the author did to prove the other extreeme. I agree with you Byron, what is the point of love? All I can say is that love and nude photos don't tend to go hand and hand, and when they do, they aren't of a concern. I shoulfd of specified that I was specificly targeting guys who go after girls purely for lust and other ideals, excluding the great other tenage guys who go after girls for their personalties.

      Delete