In an article on Fox
News entitled “NSA can access more smart phone data, report says” the
Associated Press reports on the NSA’s recent development concerning their gain
of information on particular individuals from the data on their smart phones
(i.e. iPhones, Blackberries, and Androids). Previously impassable barriers to
the data on smart phones such as blackberries have prevented the NSA from
accessing user’s information. The NSA is now able to break through these
encryptions and access “contacts, call lists, SMS traffic, notes, and location
information” of, in the words of the article, “potential threats such as
terrorists.”
In
another article on FoxNews.com the
Associated Press reports on the NSA’s ability to crack encrypted codes
protecting private information on the Internet. It also mentioned NSA’s
collaboration with certain software companies to install “back doors” in the
companies’ software.
This
raises the debate around the where the line is between the government’s search
for threats to our country’s safety, and the government’s unnecessary
inhibition on American people’s privacy. This argument stems from the Patriot
Act, passed after September 11, 2001 by the George W. Bush Administration,
which granted security agencies more powers to locate terrorist activity. The
act also expanded the powers of Security Agencies to gain personal information
on individuals to see if they have any affiliation with terrorist groups. For
example, the TSA and CAPPS II (Computer Assisted Passenger Pre-screening
System) had ready a program that would take a passenger’s information
(date-of-birth, phone number, etc.) and put it through a database to see if the
passenger had any relations with terrorist organizations or excessive criminal
records. However this potential program was put down after protests from the
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Others believe that the powers have been
taken advantage of to gain information on citizens for political purposes.
It is
sometimes necessary to trust that the government has righteous intentions. In
the case of the NSA's ability to break encrypted codes on the Internet and Smart Phones to gain individual's information, these righteous intentions are to, in the words of the Preamble,
“provide for the common defense.” However, it is also vital that we debate about whether or not the government has honorable motives becuase it results in their actions being more closely watched. By their activity being examined more carefully, they are forced to make decisions for the betterment of the people rather than for the betterment of themselves.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/06/nsa-can-reportedly-break-into-most-encrypted-internet-communications/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/08/nsa-can-access-most-smartphone-data-report-says/?test=latestnews
If the government truly was intending to use this power for a good purpose, then that would be great. We definitely want to make sure we catch any and all terrorists. But if they are planning on using it to spy on innocent U.S citizens, then that's where the line is drawn and we start to wonder.
ReplyDeleteI see the need for this type of technology, after all, recent years have engendered suspicion and there may be some logic to this type of surveillance. But I agree that there is some grey area concerning the government's motives. We are entitled to certain privacy rights and abuse of this type of technology directly infringes on them. It almost seems like an ominous harbinger of a big brother type of situation.
ReplyDeleteMcKenzie Hartmann, 5th Period