Karl Rove: When terror intrudes into the 2016 race, it helps Trump, hurts Hillary

Analysis: This article is basically a a summing up of the events of how our presidential nominees have responded to the events that have occured during the race. The article speaks of how each nominee has different takes on the events the occur and how they should be handled. Another point that is made is how the existing problems will be solved if each candidate in the race were to become president. The main point of the article is not specifically on how the terror attack is a benefit in some points to trump or hillary, but in a larger picture, how the candidates handle making split second decisions to punish and prevent problems in America. 

Synthesis: How the candidates for president go around hosting conferences and holding rallies for their presidency is like how the preachers went across the colonies trying to convert colonists fully to a certain church during The Great Awakening. The rallies are held in order to let the nominees state their plans and strategies to voters while in The Great Awakenig many settlers were being tried to converted to specific churches by using different tactics to try to convince the other colonists.

-Bakari Williams, 4th pd.