Summary: This article gives examples, in four different
states, of same sex couples facing discrimination. In Kentucky, Kim Davis is
refusing to marry all couples based on her belief that the Supreme Court decision
legalizing gay marriage nationwide is an infraction on her religious freedom. The
counterargument is that while she is more than welcome to practice her
religion, it should never impact whether or not she fulfills her duties as
Rowan County Clerk. The second display of discrimination described in this
article is a law in Mississippi that says that “adoption by couples of the same
gender is prohibited.” That law is deemed unfair because of its different
treatment of homosexual couples. In Florida, two lesbian women are denied the
right to both be included on their child’s birth certificate, despite the
Supreme Court ruling. Lastly the article discusses Jack Phillips, a cake baker from
Colorado, who refuses to provide his business to a gay wedding. His beliefs parallel
Davis’s, in that he too believes that the first amendment protects his
religious freedom and excuses his discriminatory actions.
Analysis: This article illustrates how even though we have
laws in place to protect every American citizen, some gay couples are still facing
discrimination and injustice. People such as Kim Davis, and Jack Phillips feel
they can ignore the law because of their own personal views. The first amendment
guarantees everyone freedom of religion, but not the right to deprive another
citizen of their rights. Beliefs are individual to each person, and
should therefore not be imposed on others.
Synthesis: Gay marriage has been legalized by the Supreme
Court, and yet individuals still take it upon themselves to fight the decision
in order to uphold their own beliefs. This situation is similar to when the
Supreme Court decided in the Brown vs. Board of Education case in 1954 that
segregation was not just. In this instance George Wallace chose to oppose the
decision by refusing to let black students go to the University of Alabama in
1963 because of his own prejudice. In both of these situations personal bigotry
causes people to unjustly take away basic human rights of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment