Ok so by now i have a pattern of having cannabis be the subject of my current events. This is because I am a firm believer in the power of this plant. And here is just another good reason why. A little girl by the name of Charlotte was diagnoseed with a terribble disease called Davet's Syndrome. She was diagnosed after years of having quite extreme and much too frequent seizures from when she was only months old. At first she continued to develop but after a while she stopped walking talking and eating all together. Her parents had tried every medication any doctor would prescribe. They tested what seemed like every option and there poor daughter just continued to get sicker. At one point the little girl had been having 300 grand mal siezures A WEEK! Then the husband went on line did a little research and bam! He came up on a video of a little boy with the same disease ass his daughter. The boy was being treated with DUN DUH DUN MARIJUANA! Long story short the family finally got two doctors to sign off on a prescription, they met up with some weed growing dudes who had a weed charity and he daughter was virtually cured. She went from 300 seizures a week to 2 or 3 A MONTH. The strain she uses is now used for 41 other patients. It is called Charlotte's Web (hahahaha get it?) anywho the dad's main (or only) question was why wasn't the treatment option proposed. Why did the family have to do all of this work themselves?
My thing is the little girl was dying and still so many doctors said no no no no no. Why? because of this widespread propoganda about marijuana's dangerous affects and it being a gateway drug without ANY FACTUAL CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE to back it. Everybody's looking at it as getting a little girl high. First of all the strain they used was so low in THC and so high in CBD it would not have even given her a buzz. Especially since they extracted the oils and put it in her food. Only a few MILLIGRAMS per pound of the little girl was needed for adequate doses. She only took two a day. When will people realize that the reason hemp and cannabis are outlawed are not because it's dangerous, no not at all. The real reason in fact is because pharmacuetical companies don't like cheap natural low side effect medicines. The timber company doesn't like that hemp can make paper cheaper than trees can. Hemp paper doesn’t require toxic bleaching chemicals. It can be whitened with hydrogen peroxide, which doesn’t poison waterways as chloride and bleach--the chemicals used in making wood pulp paper--do. Paper made from hemp lasts hundreds of years longer than wood-pulp paper, which decomposes and yellows with age. Hemp paper resists decomposition and does not yellow with age.
My thing is the little girl was dying and still so many doctors said no no no no no. Why? because of this widespread propoganda about marijuana's dangerous affects and it being a gateway drug without ANY FACTUAL CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE to back it. Everybody's looking at it as getting a little girl high. First of all the strain they used was so low in THC and so high in CBD it would not have even given her a buzz. Especially since they extracted the oils and put it in her food. Only a few MILLIGRAMS per pound of the little girl was needed for adequate doses. She only took two a day. When will people realize that the reason hemp and cannabis are outlawed are not because it's dangerous, no not at all. The real reason in fact is because pharmacuetical companies don't like cheap natural low side effect medicines. The timber company doesn't like that hemp can make paper cheaper than trees can. Hemp paper doesn’t require toxic bleaching chemicals. It can be whitened with hydrogen peroxide, which doesn’t poison waterways as chloride and bleach--the chemicals used in making wood pulp paper--do. Paper made from hemp lasts hundreds of years longer than wood-pulp paper, which decomposes and yellows with age. Hemp paper resists decomposition and does not yellow with age.
The Library of Congress found that, “While the hemp paper in volumes 300-400 years old is still strong, 97% of the books, printed between 1900 and 1937 on tree paper, will be useable for less than 50 years.” Hemp paper can be recycled 7 to 8 times, compared with only 3 times for wood pulp paper. The USDA reported in 1916 that an acre of hemp produced as much paper as four acres of trees annually , yet 70% of American forest have been destroyed since 1916. So you see none of these big companies care about our earth or you for that matter. It's really about the money. THERE'S PROOF FOR THAT!
No comments:
Post a Comment