Monday, February 12, 2018

larsen nichols- Michelle Obama's portrait


https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/12/politics/michelle-obama-portrait/index.html

Earlier today, the official portraits of Michelle and Barack Obama that will hang in the National Portrait Gallery were unveiled in Washington D.C. Michelle's portrait stole the show, because while it was beautiful, some people believed it bore little resemblance to her. But Philip Kennicott, an art critic for the Washington Post, has an explanation for this. He acknowledges that it's not as photographically accurate as Barack's portrait, but that the style of the artist (Amy Sherald) uses skin tones painted in a gray scale to mimic the black and white photography that was the most accessible form of visual documentation to African Americans in the 19th century. He further defends the painting in stating that portraits are an art form open to experimentation.

This article was written by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large, earlier this afternoon. he is a white male, which gives him a certain perspective, especially when commenting on the portrait of a black woman. Because this article was written so soon after the unveiling of the portraits, I'm sure few people have had the opportunity to examine them in-depth yet or really interview the artists about their work.
Personally, I think the portrait of Michelle Obama looks similar to her, but not exactly accurate. However, after reading this article, it occurred to me that it doesn't matter so much whether or not it bears an exact resemblance, but rather if it is providing representation, and that is exactly the case here. Michelle's portrait, as the first black woman in a long line of white first ladies, will provide inspiration for girls and girls of color for years and years to  come, and that's  what's really important. And the painting is beautifully done and just stunning to look at in general.

Synthesis: The events of this article can be connected to Elaine deKooning's portrait of JFK in 1963. This painting too, caused the rise of some controversy due to its experimentalism and appearance of being quickly-painted and improvisational.

7 comments:

  1. I think that the representation of the picture as a symbol is more important than its accuracy. It’s important that children can look at a portrait of a black woman who went on to do great things and see themselves in the portrait.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just think it's cool that some artistic interpretation and expression have found their way into so prestigious a project; that's got to be a good sign for us down the line

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it looks quite like her, but I'm just happy to see michelle painted in such a stunning way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maria González
    I agree with Henry. Art is open to your own interpretation meaning it’s interpreted a different way by each person. I think the artist has a nice concept on painting Michelle Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I’m sure Michelle Obama’s appreciates the thought that went into the portrait over the accuracy. I think it’s an interesting concept that is significant to history and our world today.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Henry and Melanie. Though the picture isn't very accurate, I think she still appreciates it and I think other people will appreciate seeing a black woman in the white house that has had a positive effect on everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't think the picture is super accurate but I do agree that it's more about the representation and meaning behind the picture.

    ReplyDelete