The
U.S. has remained a leading world power throughout the 20th and 21st
centuries and, despite struggles in the economy (among other things), it
continues to establish its position as leading world power. However, all those
who have power, fear of losing it, and this is especially evident in the U.S.’s
increased focus on Asia and the South Pacific. In an article on Foxnews.com, Dominic Di-Natale reports on the U.S.’s recent
drill in central Thailand that to “seize and secure an airfield at Lop
Buri…amid a humanitarian disaster. The article states that the underlying
motivation for this drill (occurring annually and named “Cobra Gold”) was to
show the Chinese that the U.S. could quickly and efficiently come to the aid of
their Asian allies surrounding China (similar to Teddy Roosevelt’s Big Stick
Policy). This is due to the United States feeling threatened by the enlargement
and strengthening of the Chinese military, especially of its development of
“anti-ship ballistic missile” which can hit a U.S. aircraft carrier from 1,200
miles away in less than 12 minutes. China has also made claims towards Pacific
land and airspace.
Every
nation has had its time of dominance, Great Britain around the time of the
American Revolution, Spain at the prime of its Spanish Armanda during the first
few years of the Age of Exploration, France during Napolean’s reign. It is not
if the U.S. will lose their position as a world power, but when. Also, one
could look at the presence in Asia not as a fear of losing power to China, but
rather as an effort to quell the spread of a communistic nation such as China.
The constant plight of nations in the world to gain more power or to mainain
the power they already have begs the question why nations want more control and
influence in the world. In the case of the United States, one might say that
their motivation for mainting their power or gaining influence is quell the
growing power of another nation that could cause harm and hardships to more
people. However, one could say that other nations, in the case of China say,
who have sought more power have the same noble intentions, but their plight to
gain more power is seen as detrimental because of certain characteristics of
their country (i.e. communism, corrupt leader/government, extremist religion,
etc.). However, there are always those who simply have greed and all of their
intentions are in the wrong place. Someday the world will become more
understanding and respectful towards the practices of different nations and
everybody will seek to make the world a better place.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/02/17/us-military-exercises-in-asia-meant-to-send-signal-to-china-say-experts/
I agree with Griffin, history has shown many times the rise and fall of world powers. I can completely understand then why the U.S. would feel it necessary to use T.R.'s "Big Stick Policy" to restate the role that we have gained. While it's sad how juvenile the concept is, it's even more sad that we won't consider the idea of sharing the power so that we can help and unify more people.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting what you said about how eventually America's dominance will come to an end, because lately I've been pondering that. It's very true, but even though we don't know when that will happen, we have to ensure that no brutal countries gain too much power in this world if we can help it. If China did become dominant, then we would live in a very different world, and most likely not a good kind of different. But, we just have to hope that whatever choices are made are for the good of the people and not for individuals in government.
ReplyDelete