According to a recent study, the numbers of mothers in need of surgery during birth ,due to their narrow pelvis size increased from 30 in 1'000 in 1960 to 36 to 1,000 today.During past years having a small pelvis size meant both death for the child and the mother . Australia researchers say that the new trend is likely to continue, yet it will not limit the surgical birth but it will probably become antiquate.Dr.Philli Mitteroecker has pointed out that with the gathered information the question of evolution has risen:Has the medical intervention have altered the perspective of the natural selection ?It's been stated that the pelvis hasn't grown wider throughout history ,even though the head of the human baby is larger than other primates.Scientists predict that the global rate of cases in which the baby couldn't fit the birth canal would be about 3%.
The article from BBC news informs the people about the current effects ,studies, and discoveries of science and the environment. Written by Helen Brings , educated women of society who probably wrote the article to informs the women about their bodies .Statistics such as those involving science and changes through time show history in a different way by showing the marks that each decade has and how it affected the human body as part of evolution .
I think that is interesting how we are still evolving into different people. It might be due to not being survival for the fittest and just the passing of a mutation of the genes.
ReplyDelete