“Bring the Guillotine Back to Death Row”
By: Conor Friedersdorf from The Atlantic
Commentary by: Sam Smathers 4th
This article
is about wanting to bring the guillotine back as the primary way to kill people
in regards to capital punishment because it is quick, painless, and cost
effective. The cons are that no one wants to be the executioner and that it is
super gory and nasty. The author thinks that if the United States made the
guillotine the only mean of capital punishment acceptable, that capital
punishment would disappear because no one would want to drop the knife down on
someone’s head.
I am
neither con nor pro capital punishment. I feel like our prison system is too far
from what it should for me to even take a position on that. Before we even
think about capital punishment we should think of all the people in prison that
committed minor crimes and how they are eating up all of this money that we
could put toward education. I think we should have less people in prison and if
that means enforcing capital punishment for crimes such as mass murder than
that would be okay. I would rather spend all the money it would take to keep
that guy alive on something like education or sustainable energy rather than on
meals for a guy that killed thirty people. I think prisons should find a way to
make money, they have lots of people that just sit around and do nothing all
day, maybe if they taught these convicts how to be superb gardeners or awesome
customer service people than jails wouldn’t need all the government funding
that they do. The goal needs to be how to reduce the costs of running prisons,
because they gobble up too much money.
I totally agree with you that prisons should find more ways to make money. While the thought of a guillotine making a come back is a little sickening, they are headed in the right direction of trying to eliminate costs.
ReplyDelete